Showing posts with label OD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OD. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Survey to help Design the Nov 2013 OD Conference



OD and the Grand Challenges of Global Society is a theme that around 40 OD enthusiasts in India converged on in earnest online interaction and face to face group-work. We are conducting a survey to get opinions from beyond this group, and your response would be of great significance.


This group, which hosts this blogspace - the OD India Sangam, will work closely with IISc ( http://bit.ly/GL6MPN  ), where the conference will be held in Nov 2013, and AHRD our conference secretariat, to design the conference. To be held in close association with the Asia ODN (AODN : http://www.aodn.org/), we expect to host around 500 delegates whose composition will depend on your inputs and outreach. We're already challenged by the implications of an experiential design to meet with significant dimensions in our environment. Nonetheless, your opinion matters. For some pertinent detail you may also access us at our Facebook page called OD India Sangam.


This survey will close by April 5, 2012, and we hope you will oblige with a sincere response, preferably by March 31 itself.  


Here's the link to the survey  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/C9BN5TL  


If you can copy and paste this link to your browser, it should help..


See you soon,

Friday, February 17, 2012

Reference blogs

Edith Seashore and Michael Broom have been passionate practitioners of the art of OD. They are more at work, than we may imagine here in India. thought we should refer their blog once in a while, I owe a lot to them, as hey relentlessly take the Back to Basics session at Annual ODN conferences in USA.

Here is the link http://www.chumans.com/blog/page/2/

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Is OD a Part of HRD or HRD a Part of OD


Is OD a Part of HRD or HRD a Part of OD: a view
T. V. Rao
I thought this controversy is no more.

Several years ago I was invited by Dr. B. L. Maheshwari the Founder of the Centre for Organization Development to consider joining it as its Director. 

That was the time I was doing three main jobs: Chairman of the Post Graduate Program at IIMA, President of ISABS and also was in the thick of setting up the National HRD Network. ISABS facilitated the work of HRD Network by agreeing to offer a HRD Facilitators lab jointly with NHRDN. NHRDN was not known in those days and it is the magnanimity of ISABS that has facilitated NHRDN to launch its HRD Facilitators program. That was also the time the Indore Management Association launched the Indore chapter of NHRDN as a part of Indore Management Association. When I approached some people in Indore to start a Chapter of NHRDN they said, “We have a strong Management body here and why is there a need for starting another body? We will do it as a part of IMA”. I have readily agreed. That was the time HRD Network was launched in south by the Madras Management Association thanks to Dr K. M. Thiagarajan. Russi Modi inaugurated it and the NHRDN at Ahmedabad for which K. K. Verma and Anil Khandelwal were active leaders launched the ISTD, Ahmedabad chapter on NHRDN platform. There was a lot of collaboration among these bodies at that time at local chapter levels. Te questions were not asked. In fact a full issue of HRD Newsletter was devoted to HRD and OD. IIMA called its program HROD program when it offered the same for HR Facilitators and NHRDN called it HRD.

In my innocence or eagerness to promote HRD, I suggested to Dr. Maheshwari that if I have to join COD and lead it as its Director, my vision will be to make it a HRD lead institute and I would use it as a centre for HRD and Applied BS. He said I may do anything I like except changing the name of COD to CHRD or Centre for Applied Behavioural Science.  Thank God that I never asked Dr. Maheshwari to change the name of COD for me to join it!  Sometimes I wonder why Dr. Maheshwari called it Centre for Organization Development. Dr.B.L.Maheshwari set up the Centre for Organization Development (COD) in 1980 with three core values: strong client orientation, high standards of quality and an Informal Growth & performance oriented work culture. In fact Dr Maheshwari was neither a member of ISABs nor trained at NTL to the best of my knowledge. However he has done a lot to promote OD in his own way through his centre. The COD library is filled with the photographs of a number of OD stalwarts. He used largely Management by Objectives as an OD tool in his early years and latter he and the COD have done a lot of work on Organizational Culture, Performance Management, Managerial effectiveness, Coaching, Quality circles and such other areas and in a variety of sectors. The work of COD makes it clear that you need not be an accredited OD Facilitator to do solid OD work. I hold this view to HRD, Applied Behavioural Science and even Management. There have been many successful Managers who manage their firms well and they don’t have an M B A.

The answer to whether OD is a part of HRD or HRD a part of OD is in our minds and it depends on the perspective we use. I wonder sometimes why the same question is not asked with Management as a filed.  Is Management (Professional Management or all categories of Management) a part of HRD or HRD a part of Management? At National level Management is a part of HRD. The AICTE which governs Management Institutes, Engineering colleges etc. is a part of the HRD Ministry. At Institutional level HRD is a discipline and is a part of OB or HRM and OD is taught as a part of  OB or HRM. In L&T OD was conceptualised as paart of HRD and yet some years the Vice-President to whom HRD was reporting was called as Vice-President Personnel & OD. In organizations where there is no OD the question does not arise. Some organizations have separate OD cells. For example HMT several decades ago had an OD cell. In L&T no less a person then Udai Pareek recommended in as long ago as 1975 recommended OD to be part of HRD. The intention was to have HRD also undertake OD work to facilitate organizational learning. Some organizations have called their training facility as HRD Institute.  

In my view OD is not a function. It is a process, it has technology and it follows a set of values and it should remain so. I would not even want OD to become a discipline or a function. When you make anything a function in a country like India where means have a knack of becoming ends and the original purposes get quickly forgotten, I don’t recommend any one to jump and create new functions and new structures. (For example Anna Hazare movement started as movement to curb corruption a strong Lokpal is supposes to be a means to curb corruption. No on e has ever seen if Lokpal will have the real capability to curb correction. It is a pious hope of all of us. But now corruption has gone to the background and Lokpal bill has become a matter of debate and corruption continues quietly to do its work while we all debate Lokpal).
Sometimes I feel that making a discipline as a function does more harm to the discipline and its development than letting it be. The same thing happened to HRD in some organizations. There are HRD Managers not knowing whether they represent Human Resource Development or Human Resource Department. The main job of some of them is to get right agency to handle their HR through a process of outsourcing. They spend their time standardising the outsourcing practices like floating tenders to get HR services at low cost  than to offer HR services themselves. This is a clear consequence of establishing a department and giving it a mandate. I dread the ay OD becomes a department as we will have another tender floating and consulting hunting department. It was not the intention of Udai Pareek. And the first HRD Manager in the country Dr. Dennyson Pereira  has been both a member of ISABS and an NTL trained persona and has done real good OD work by taking up diagnostic studies and carrying out a number of real OD interventions in OD. He did all this as part of HRD.

 I think the issue is unnecessary. The answer to whether OD is part of HRD or HRD is part of OD depends on the need, convenience and your approach. You could be right either way and argue well your case. Both can be treated broadly as philosophies, processes, value driven disciplines, functions and departments etc. For me recognising that OD as a process and respecting it is of paramount importance and making it a function is doing disservice to the field of ever growing field of OD. It has body of knowledge and it is a wide open field. India is a proud nation. While Kurt Lewin and team developed OD is the west India had CD in the east. The Community Development programs in India started as long ago as Independent Indian started or even before had the same principles in them as OD principles: people participation, facilitation by an external facilitator trained in the respective field (agriculture, health, education etc.), with the support of the top management (village Pachayats and other influential leaders) and sued a variety of interventions.  HRD is as old as civilisation and civilisations grew as a result of people developing themselves through a variety of activities and actions including learning and development and not because of HRD Departments as they did not exist in those days! 

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

CALL FOR INDIAN OD CASE STUDIES

FIRST CALL FOR  INDIAN OD CASE STUDIES

Rupande  Padaki,  Joseph George, Gopal Mahapatra and Mary Mathew

The role documented OD activity in India will play is immeasurable.  Documented OD activity will serve as a resource useful in consulting, teaching, research and knowledge acquisition.  This call aims to motivate members of the ODINSANGAM to contribute written OD case studies they have witnessed, been actors in, heard about.  Case studies can be successful ones or even more interesting, experiences of failed OD efforts. In other words both success and failure stories are most welcome.  Case studies of OD in an Indian context, with Indian actors, in Indian organizational climates and settings are welcomed.  Case studies of foreign multi-national OD experience in India, are also solicited.  All case studies must be originally written by the author/s. 

The general definition of OD given by French and Bell, 1999 can be used as a guideline.  They define OD as follows:  “…. a long-term effort led and supported by top management, to improve an organization's visioning, empowerment, learning, and problem-solving processes, through an ongoing, collaborative management of organizational culture, with special emphasis on the consultant-facilitator role and the theory and technology of applied behavioral science, including participant action research" (French & Bell, 1999). 

 In the long run an edited book on OD case studies will be published and sequels evolved.  Rich OD data on the Indian experience is rare to find. This resource base will have use for both Indians and global change managers alike. 

The following are the guidelines for OD case study submission:

(a) Aspects to note when writing your case study:
Clearly written case studies highlighting the nature of the change that was / is being managed are encouraged.  Indianness in the theme is essential, however cases may well be on a MNC in India, and experiences if any on Indians practicing OD in Indian companies abroad.  Cases on OD successes and failures are equally welcome.    Care must be taken to elaborate  the process in each case study.  The process can be described as follows:

(i)      Planning for change, level of change, individual, group, organization, other, include the industrial sector, functional area if necessary
(ii)    The nature of change will describe the element being changed like, behavioral, structural, process, culture, technology, customer, skills, etc
(iii)  Other interventions like quality movements, HR interventions, cultural change also qualify
(iv)  The characters being addressed in the case must be described: namely the client system, the interventionist (change agent) or the top management of the system.  
(v)    The method of intervention used, for example the diagnostic tools used, the process for diagnosis, target behaviors for change or elements of change, assessments of facilitating and restraining factors, feedback and procedure used for the feedback process, feedback reception, the design of the intervention, the actual intervention,  sub systems involved, evaluation of change, feedback process, success or failure.  Difficulties encountered.
(vi)  Any theory used: for example, action research, systems theory, OD theories, group dynamics and process consulting
(vii)Any hint of philosophies or schools of thought used, like use of science, socio-technical approach, sociology, radical humanism, functionalism,  behaviorist.
(viii)                     The outcome of the intervention, impact and effects, long and short term
(ix)  Learnings and insights from the case study

Whilst these guidelines are essential to maintain uniformity and quality, minor deviations around the guideline is permissible. 

(b) Style guide to follow when writing your case study:

All case studies must have an abstract and main case study.  All abstract must not exceed 250 words.  The following guideline must be followed:

This is the title of your OD Case study and it has a font size of 14 using Times Roman


This is the abstract of the case study.  This abstract must make clear a summary of the process described in (a). The font size for the body of the abstract is size 12 and Times Roman.  Kindly restrict yourself to 250 words. This abstract will be used to screen your case study and assess if it fits and is suitable for the OD database.  In case it is found lacking feedback will be provided. The case studies will be reviewed by Dr Rupande Padaki, Gopal Mahapatra, Dr Joseph and Prof Mary Mathew.  The deadline for the abstract is July 25th.   Kindly email the case study to marymathew24@gmail.com   All emails bearing your abstract must carry the subject heading “OD Case study”.  Authors will be members from ODINsangam for now, with co-opted co-authors where necessary.  All abstracts must have “key words” below them.  Key words will be small phrases describing the sector of your case study and anything you wish to highlight. Key words will evolve organically and be used to index case studies over time.  Kindly use, Times Roman 12 and italic, for key words. Once all case studies are received we will send you an email with details of how to go about writing your main case study.  Nevertheless, note that the style guide for the main case study will be the same as is in your abstract (namely, font style, size, headings, text).  The main case study must not exceed 10,000 words. The probable time line for the full paper will be October 25th, 2011. Enjoy!

Word count: 257

Keywords:  Industrial sector, highlight, main issue, main actor


Important Disclaimer:  All authors please note that, abstracts and main case studies must have a disclaimer stating that "The author/s of this case study is/are responsible for permissions from the organization whose name is being mentioned in the OD case study”, alternatively the name must be camouflaged. Also, state that, “To the best of my/ our knowledge, my/our  case study does not contain plagiarism or any kind nor does it contain any form of self plagiarism”.


(c)  Screening process:

The screening of case studies will be done in two stages.  First, the abstract will be reviewed by four reviewers as mentioned above.  Once, the abstract is accepted, there will be a call for the full paper.  Second, the full paper will be further reviewed and comments provided by the same team of reviewers for revisions if necessary.  Following the style guide is mandatory.  The abstract and full paper will be screened to assess if the guidelines mentioned in points (a), (b) and the disclaimer are strictly followed.  Irrespective of the time duration of the OD exercise in weeks, months and years, and the complexity of the case, the length of the case study must not be more than 10000 words and less than 5000.  Short case studies that lack OD content as mentioned in the guidelines will not received high reviews, neither will cases longer than 10000 words.   Plagiarism and self plagiarism of any kind must be avoided. For any queries/clarifications please write to marymathew24@gmail.com

We look forward to your submissions !!!


***

Friday, April 15, 2011

Vaartalaap of Bangalore OD Retreat April 9 2011





The Wordle image above captures the essence of notes taken during the OD retreat of April 9 2011 at WIPRO Bangalore.

What a fantastic tribute to our time spent together.




Proceedings at the OD Retreat

9th April, 2011
(WIPRO, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore)




                                                                                          Prepared By:
                                                                                           Deboleena Roy, and Vijayalakshmi,
                                                                                          IBS Bangalore
Edited by :  Dr. Vivekanand (IBS) ; Dr. Joseph George A; Vishy Shankara (WIPRO)

Purpose of the meeting: To converse amongst those interested in OD in India, the potential and possibilities of associating with each other in a group in face to face mode so as to get first impressions of its core values, identity and purpose.

Venue:  WIPRO, Leadership Centre, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore.


Participants*:

Name
Organisation
1.      Aparna Devagiri
3M
2.      Suvas Mahapatra
TCS
3.      Dr. Harald Patrick
Christ University
4.      Glady Jacob
Christ University
5.      Dr. Pallab B
Citrix
6.      Naga Siddharth
Citrix
7.      Dr. Kalpana Sampath
EFIL Educational Services
8.      Dr. JM Sampath
Arpitha Associates
9.      Dr. Randhir Pushpa
Unisys
10.  Dr. Mary Mathew
IISc
11.  Archana Arcot
Infosys BPO
12.  Sushma Sharma
Resonate Consulting
13.  Nisha Ninan
Nokia
14.  Vishwanath G
O&A
15.  Dr. Gopal Mahapatra
Oracle
16.  Dr. Rupande Padaki
P&P
17.  Dr. Vijai Padaki
P&P
18.  Bikramjit Maitra
Independent Consultant
19.  Sudheesh Venkatesh
Azim Premji Foundation
20.  Rev. Dr. James Kannanthanam
St. Claret
21.  Rev. Dr. Thomas T
St. Claret
22.  Dr. C Balaji
Symphony
23.  Dr. T.V Rao
T.V. Rao Learning Systems
24.  Mrs. Nandini Chawla
T.V. Rao Learning Systems
25.  Kartikeyan V
Vistas Consulting
26.  Dr. Joseph George
Wipro
27.  Hrishi Mohan
Wipro
28.  Vishy Shankara
Wipro
29.  Rev. Fr. Abraham E, SJ
XLRI
30.  Kushal Ghosh
Azim Premji Foundation
31.  Dr. Vivekanand
IBS Bangalore
32.  Deboleena Roy
IBS Bangalore
33.  B. Vijayalakhsmi
IBS Bangalore

*Briefly present – Abhijit Bhaduri, Chief Learning Officer, WIPRO; Nayana Prabhu and Dr. Vishal Shah, members of Corporate HRD, WIPRO.

The gathering paid tribute to all the great souls who had contributed to the research and practice of OD in India, by observing a 2 minute silence at the start of deliberations. This request was especially in memory of Ranjan Acharya, Senior Vice President Corporate Human Resources Development, WIPRO and Dr. Udai Pareek, the legendary OD and HRD proponent in India.

Rev. Dr. Tom T CMF, welcomed the gathering, explained the context and set the ball rolling. In his inaugural address, he stated that HRD is a function and OD is a process, as had been stated by Dr. TV Rao recently. He shared with the group  Dr. T.V Rao’s support for the setting up of an OD Network for India, suited to the country’s conditions and useful for its development.
 Dr. Tom T requested everyone to focus on:
·         Building a relationship
·         Some task with the understanding that our common values  would help in creating an identity for the group.

Dr. Tom quoted St. Francis of Assissi “Start with what is necessary, do what is essential and then the impossible will happen.”

Subsequently, Dr. Joseph shared with the group good wishes from a few eminent practitioners of OD who were not able to travel to the gathering and requested the assembly to introduce themselves, their work and also state what brought them to the meeting.

While some views of this nature are not attended to exhaustively in this report, suffice it to say, that the outpouring around reasons for being present included the following:

1.     What one could ‘get’ from the group to apply to one’s situation- whether from line HR, Consulting or the world of publishing – academic or practitioner variety
2.     The history of OD in India and its contemporariness. ATIRA-Michigan Western continental and Tavistock traditions – the Calico Mills experiment, AK Rice, Stanley Seashore and Ravi Mathai’s work of building institutions around people, in the Western regions of India; the faith of Kasturbhai Lalbhai the business leader in humanistic approaches to institution building
3.     The weaving from history into the roots of the group’s identity – e.g. Mohan Nadkarni, Suresh Srivastva, Udai Pareek
4.     The need or desire to overcome personal barriers in collaboration
5.     The transition in OD from conceptual rigor of a Systems perspective to a bag of tricks and tools that had partial and localised impact
6.     The amorphous boundary of effectiveness – from single unit organisations to networks of organisations in institutional form
7.     Theory Building for the Indian context
8.     Technology and it’s impact to the meaning of work itself in what may be called Organisation 3.0, and early fatigue from such pilot projects implying the need to question fundamentals in organisational science
9.     The evolving and transitory shared understanding of the OD professional’s job description
10.  Science, Productivity and the role of the human being in the tension between adoption and generation of processes and knowledge
11.  Emergence, generativist perspectives, and the thriving on chaos of complex adaptive systems of perpetual learning in the inter-cultural space of the global world
12.  Clarity in the foundation of organisational concepts, so as to foster a symbol of excellence as the lasting images of NTL or Tavistock grounded in India
13.  Self as instrument of Change as the core of the organisation is the person
14.  The space of Science as from ‘God’ or a spiritual base on which OD can work
15.  OD as ART form – Applied Learning, Research and Theorisation as also an adventure as such

Such being the variety in outpouring, the ground was set to explore the potential that the group so unleashed for itself.

The rest of the meeting veered around two dominant themes. – Who are WE? And WHAT should we do? It appeared that the apparition of a label for the group or nomencalture for what the group represents would be immediate confirmation of WHO we are, and yet, by some chaotic miracle, and the love for exploration, the name eluded the group.

The conversational nature of the Open Space was the first symptom in which ‘change’ was experienced. The first intervention was that of the many ‘interveners’ as attendees opening up to a space that they wished to hold together, tenuously holding a peace within themselves. They held their own to accommodate the wisdom and perspective others from diverse backgrounds could influence the proceedings with. The recording below, will we hope rekindle that value as the group reflects its next actionables, dutifully recorded by the youngest members in this gathering.
As a building block of a rapport that was yet to be fully realised, the group was a mixture of maturity and child-like eagerness, potent as it is in combination to engage each other in a commitment that outdoes the personal space that each could envisage at this moment of engagement and exploration. The first change welcomed by the self-styled community was that of breaking from the published agenda to work in a circle of open space conversations. 
Hence the report below is more of a recall of the themes that emerged than ‘who’ held the view. The idea is to register the WHAT over the WHO. In this process, if any issues got left out, the fault is entirely that of the authors of this record. They take refuge in the inclusiveness of the internet as they welcome other attendees to add in comment form or direct into blog-space to complement this effort. 
Hence, the notes are a mixture of notations, bullet-points and notions, than a declarative set of propositions that people alluded to. Thus a note of caution is in order. AND a note of HOPE. 


First the CAUTION : Terms used here may not be intelligible to all who attended, given the varying experiences and backgrounds from which the dreamers, realists and philosophers arrived to this conversation. 

The HOPE – One of the main unifiers in the group seems to be the value for sharing and learning. The incompleteness of this report is but a reflection of the group’s emerging identity. We’re work- in-process, as much as work in progress. 


The group had the benefit of a Mind-Map in which inputs from 13 people were arranged under two maps. One was for WHAT THE GROUP SHOULD BE LIKE; and the other on WHAT THE GROUP SHOULD NOT BE LIKE. The inputs were shown to the gathering through a projector onto a screen. The gathering split into small groups to assemble again around themes that they thought aligned with expressions they read.

WHAT THE GROUP SHOULD BE LIKE included
  1. Research Publications – Advocate Theory; opportunities for research; arrive at a balance between research and action
  2. Network – A spirit of inclusion, Support and Encourage, Connect and reconnect,
  3. Education – Platform for learning, Internship for OD, Educational Workshops on OD
  4. Values – Integrative values, Spiritual explorations; Metaphoric expressions – Indianness; based on actualities (empiricism?) and eclectic
  5. Nature of membership – of individuals, and not of Organisations / Institutions
WHAT THE GROUP SHOULD NOT BE LIKE included
  1. Not too structured, non-hierarchical;
  2. Not a consulting body; Not overly a profiteering body with an excess of commercialism;
  3. Not Exclusive to the point of being elitist, Not to be on a membership drive
  4. Not region oriented or affiliated to strangulating holds of other associations
  5. Not to over-design the nature of the association
This summary facilitation from Kartik and Vishwanath gave the group an opportunity to opine further from the depth of their experiences and the desires they came to the moments with. Some of them are mentioned below. 
  1. Polarities of Formality and Informality lingered through the day, where formality resembled need for control of a functional nature; whereas informality resembled a desire to escape the tyranny of the reminders of previous associations with groups that had a similar notion.
  2. The issues of Scale of the group’s efforts and the source of satiation and fulfilment recursively crept back at turning points in the group’s exploration. All the same, effective collaboration to achieve purposes to be understood mutually by members came in as a desired intervention of statement and intent.
  3. When a suggestion was made on an area of ‘First’ focus – e.g. employee contract between the disillusioned and cynical employee and the distant and formal employer; a suggestion on scale of effort was offered.  
  4. Need for groups and dysfunctions of previous groups; burden of past perceptions – whether ISISD, NHRDN or otherwise. What can association keep as ‘excitable’ or ‘connection’ with? The heterogeneity of membership and homogeneity of purpose or need fulfillment seemed a paradoxical union to be embraced for the acceptance of the group.
  5. The Language for hope shone through the ambiguous messy space of content – e.g. a Space – in which like-minded people of multi-faceted needs to embrace the multi-dimensionality of organisation. Space allows conversation, as a natural, human art; rather than the burden of being assessed and held to restricted charters. Space – for answers, and to frame the right questions. Yearning for a kind of liberation from restricting frames of the mind in the Indian context seemed a hidden desire that spoke like a Collective Unconscious of the group. e.g. Resourcefulness for Collaboration, Togetherness for networking
  6. Mental models of – organizations, role-taking – some of which is colluded with in the past by members in the group – connotations that we created….the danger of a new Utopia
  7. Volunteering for the happiness principle – or fun of participating or joy of participating (akin to ‘flow’ that Mihaly C writes about?)
  8. Space has a boundary – a structure; and to check the non-boundedness of a non-physical world  that gives rise to escapist notions, a realist grounding was required.
  9. Core – of walking the talk – a life-space to build and live with – deal with that was not dealt with so as not to recreate failed structures or unfulfilled spaces
  10. The dissipative potential of initial energy is the metaphor from Physics that reminds us of how we may calibrate the pace and energy that we carry along.
  11. Metaphor – of aangan, a courtyard seemed apt for the Indian context.
  12. Space for search – for novelty, new discovery or to uncover something
  13. 'Converse as you organize and organize as you converse' as a canon for our work
  14. Title can emerge. The undercurrent of identity – shadow of unformed personal identities?
  15. The antecedent of experience for judgments in history – the dangers of collusions in that identity Who are we to judge the past?
  16. What energy attracts all of or some of us?  The book of presence –  Host as structure –and commonality of change
  17. Members’ expressed need and felt need – the utility of a space or network or association
  18. The role of content in the group in defining identity seemed just as inviting and unexplored in dynamics.
  19. There are multiple ways of connecting, perhaps not all are formally addressed or capable of being so addressed. Yet, the yearning for it being present is a reason for this group to converse about it.
  20. The expectation of flow- as a hidden agenda of great potential – for the sheer delight of experiencing flow.
  21. What brought us together apart from the host’s  email invitation? What are we there for?
  22. Basis of need – a lot happening in different sectors in the country – efforts and results – as lessons that we could use
  23. To pass on lessons on education e.g. why OD did not work in NGOs – the language of shared-renewal – need to share and need to learn – the completion that OD lends to the largeness and comprehensiveness of organisational life.
  24. OD is larger in definition – compared to HRD; for it is more comprehensive in its techniques and richer in it’s processes.
  25. An immediate activity that can fulfill the needs of a larger community could perhaps relieve the tension of unformed identity.
  26. Needs of those present and those with whom we are connected – articulate the need around which an activity can be arranged
  27. Give and Get Value as a re-affirmation of the Polarity of breath in life – Inhale and Exhale
  28. Don’t be in a hurry to formalize – breathe awhile.
  29. The sentient organization and the relative power of the individual
  30. Presuppositions in the WHYs of existence. Simon Sinek’s work of recent times. Learn share, evolve as a work ethic for the group? The Newtonic space of a Ladder of inference based on different pre-suppositions of logic; as against the latticework of the HOWs of process.
  31. Potential of Individual and Group – the power of a forum or group – that allows learning that formalizes knowledge – validation, supplementation – being more than a mere conglomerate
  32. People disseminate meaning relevant to its time
  33. Synergy through knowledge can satisfy search for meaning
  34. Self as the unit of change – and organization as an abstract or removed entity from individual
  35. Philosophical change form mechanistic to humanistic – respecting another's point of view – as the prompt for OD in the West
  36. Is it possible that OD has served its purpose and we need another way of looking at organization wellness? Would that be a frontier exploration? Or do we restrict ourselves only to intervention experiences?
  37. Seeking movement forward in units of social systems at different levels – individual, group, organizations, country – what are we moving forward? OD / change Management?
  38. The freedom from singularity – singularity and co-existence – as polarities of another kind
  39. Globalization has precipitated the need for Indianness
  40. The specificity of who we are versus the space in which to relate to this identity. E.g. a Westerner coming from his/her space entering an Indian space
  41. The Need for expansion of opportunities, capacities requires support groups
  42. The restrictiveness of a project group – how can that thinking include non-project thinking?
  43. India - The Superpower that has not actualized its potential as a binding force for this group as well?
  44. Restlessness of non- action – the restlessness of the elusive ground on what we stand? And the paradox of apparent hope
  45. The giving and receiving of strokes to edify the purpose of a group – support and encourage as drivers of a body of people like this
  46. Self as instrument of Change – as a founding principle for membership behaviors in the group of OD affiliates.
  47. Balance-sheet of successes and failures – change at slower rate than could have been. Corporates score over government led or government supported systems. E.g. Survey feedback – where has it worked? How did it relate to OD? Reduction of survey to a public relations tool. What conditions lead to such outcomes? Which OD principles were not used or neglected? So also for Transactional analysis as intervention techniques. LSIP, as visited by proponents from the WEST and practitioners in India
  48. Facilitating the coming together of minds.  A documentation is required for validation of efforts
  49. MDI brought out a directory of OD practitioners around 10-15 years ago. Groundwork as this requires a forum, for there is work that individuals cannot accomplish alone
  50. What is with the nature of commitment in an interest group? What will hold it together?
  51. 6 or 7 points of connection, said in different ways – enough for closure. Over and Done – OD
  52. Distance from the ideal – a general good feel – to where do we go from here? The role of our favorite whys may come into the picture.
  53. Go back to a 1 or 2 small doable agenda. Make a success of 1 doable agenda and let the larger forum
  54. Sharing and receiving – core to the process. A deepening of the space necessary – essentially for getting to know each other through one’s work
  55. Knowledge Managers meet on a monthly basis – would it be practical for a hosting of the forum on similar lines?
  56. Proposals of listing down of all OD interventions in the last 10-15 years; 3 months
  57. Step 1 - List just 2 opportunities – 1. Success – 1 – failure – where you got your fingers burnt
  58. Step 2 – a forum, rather than an individual compiles e.g. XLRI can volunteer and some of us can volunteer; OR owned by this forum with resources from XLRI. Gopal, Mary to create a template for the group on qualification of cases / caselets
  59. Anchor for full nation OR commence with experiences of those currently stationed in Bangalore although experiences could have been in say NOIDA
  60. Qualification of Cases or caselets – building on a bibliography of what is already there from secondary sources – Archana, Balaji – technology – copyrights, annotation
  61. To be or not to be – to the OD Rose – as by any other name – it smells as sweet
  62. The sensitivity to observe and state the silence of the listeners. Goodness of the group as the reason for silence?
  63. Need for rapport through sharing and getting beyond strangers in diversity; need for practicality through manageable small groups around expertise areas
  64. Definitions of OD? Speed, scope, boundaries of OD. The regularity with which a Back to Basics session is taken up at the ODN’s Annual Conferences in USA. To meet the tensions of the field through what we bring through in cases and caselets.
  65. Professional Practice Guidelines through ethical dimensions
  66. Intervention as ethical responsibility in intervening in a living system
  67. Work towards Core Values – imbibe in competency outwardly and subject it to a larger interpersonal space than in one-on-one alone
  68. Being in the right profession vs practicing the profession right. What do we owe ourselves? how do we support each other in this journey of ethical dimensions?
  69. As long as our good soul is alive – this community – how do we take it forward?
  70. Professionals versus Practitioners - the nascent stage of the OD profession in India
  71.  Maybe the neutralization of OD itself is taking place – e.g. OD for accent training – a call for standards or guidelines that differentiate or legitimize the field
  72. Tools in unfreezing abound, tools of refreezing are rarer. Hence the job-hopping that follows such a trend and a vicious cycle of ethics. Going back to process rather than technique is required Also, to learn from social symptoms as the Hippocrates oath in the medical profession. Or the politician who takes oath under the constitution. The generation of a discussion is itself indication of the significance of the need for dialogue and conformance to ethics.
  73. Look at the flux in the field as opportunity to create something for India in OD
  74. ODIN – Norse God – threshold – myth and symbolism of purpose
  75. Space deriving from Open Space

The initiatives identified by the group:

     I.        Rev. Dr. Tom T took the responsibility of circulating a set of workable Core Values for the group on OD practice

   II.        Dr. JM Sampath took the responsibility for organizing a 3 day retreat. Kartikeyan will work with Dr. JM Sampath on this.

  III.        Fr. Abraham SJ suggested creating websites, blogs and asked all the 30 members present in the meeting to contribute 2 cases each towards the blogs and websites. The idea of submitting two cases (one success and one failure) was initially put forth by Dr. Vijai Padaki.

 IV.        Dr. Mary Mathew, Dr. Gopal Mahapatra  took the responsibility of compiling a caselet history for learning more deeply about our work and to know each toher better through our work and experience.

  V.        Dr. Rupa Padaki and Dr. Sampath took the initiative for creating a database of OD Practitioners.

  VI.        Vishy and Nag took the responsibility of forming a  blog / group  as a space for communication and exchange of views

 VII.        Dr. C Balaji and Dr. Archana Arcot took the initiative of compiling a bibliography on OD.

           
As  a fitting finale for the day long conclave, P.S .Narayan who is part of  Eco-Eye – Wipro’s Sustainability initiative – gave a thought stimulating and wonderful presentation on   ‘Sustainability and  Business Strategy’ and the agenda of the presentation was:
  • Defining the sustainability problem
  • Business and Sustainability
  • Wipro’s vision and approach
  • Some burning questions
Some of the key point of the presenation  were Exponential economic progress growth after the industrial revolution
a.     Number of planets needed to sustain the whole world at the existing level of different national consumption. For example, if the world’s consumption level equaled that of the US, we would need 5 planets.
b.    Presented the world ecologist debt day calendar
c.     Humanity’s conundrum
d.    What does business owe to society and the planet
e.     The spectrum of approaches by WIPRO
f.     People and wealth creation
g.    Relationship of business and sustainability is no longer a troubled relationship
h.     The connection between competitive advantage and social issues by Michael Porter
i.      WIPRO’s journey towards being a responsible Global Corporation,
j.      WIPRO’s Sustainability framework
k.     Initiatives for good citizenship at WIPRO
l.      GHG reductions Goals vs targets, water efficiency at WIPRO,
m.   Biodiversity in WIPRO Campuses,
n.     Employees: agents of positive change,
o.    Lifecycle responsibility: the Wipro PC case.

Most importantly, the neurological import from Daniel Goleman’s book Ecological Intelligence indicated that mankind is ill-prepared to tackle the humongous size of the ecological imbalance. We are likely to take a short-term flight syndrome than grapple with the problem in a collaborative, problem solving manner – typical of OD future challenges. 
JG  the  host of the day,  thanked the gathering. The meeting was adjourned by Fr. Tom at 5:50 pm on 9th April, 2011.
The members departed with the hope of meeting each other in the next meet .  They left taking away memories in their heart of that beautiful day which they had devoted towards the beginning of a great idea that needed to be transformed into reality by its implementation. Contributing towards the development of OD and to fulfill the individual needs as well as the need of the nation is an idea larger than the individual - or so it seemed.